Thursday, January 19, 2012

Analyzing A Photograph From Another Time

The three things I tried to address when I analyzed this photograph were: what was the intention of the photographer? What visual elements did she use to show her intention? And what reaction her photograph illicited in me and how she ilicited it?

When I first looked at the picture I thought it was just a documentary photo. That it showed a time period objectively and did not give any bias as to the photographer's personal opinion. The closer I studied the picture however, the more I realized that their was a definite emotion that was trying to be captured by Dorothea Lange. The first thing that I always look at (at least consciously) is the faces of the people in the photograph. The white plantation overseer has an expression that is hard to define. It is a face that is not smug, or confident, but rather one that shows a person who has had power their whole life and likes to enforce, maybe cruelly. It is a look of power and his whole posture and demeanor enforces this claim to power. He is leaning against the car, his leg propped against it, like a conqueror stepping on a new frontier, or Archangel Michael stepping on Satan (a memorable picture from my childhood). This man is the subject of the picture and every object and field hand points to him and reaffirms his positition of power. This seems to be the photographer's intent and I'll try to prove why.

First off, he is seemingly surrounded in a glow of light. The light comes from the top right corner and wraps around him and the car before retreating back to the right middle. To look at the black field hands in the background you have to pull yourself from the light and examine the background a little deeper. The only dark spot inside the circle of light, is a small dot that I missed at first when I glanced at the photo. It is a man's head who seems to be in the background, leaning against the building. What is important here is the size of his body and head compared to the overseer. The overseer seems like a giant compared to this head and towers over it, looking down on it, but also looking away, signifying that this man doesn't really matter.

The geometry and use of shapes in this picture is also really cool the more you look at. Everything is pulling down and to the right, where the man is standing. The building lines run downwards and the patio runs downward and to the field hands. From the field hands you can follow their legs and body posture in a series of right angles and stairways to reach the overseer. The man closest to the overseer is the visual guide that jumps you to the boss's face and then runs down, going from his face to his arm then his extended knee and looping back to the circular lines of the car and dissapearing back to the right. All in all, this is a complete photograph that really lets ur eyes explore around the picture and captures many different elements involved in the scene.

The response this photo illicited in me was a slight bit of anger towards this man at his assurance, and claim to the scene. He is obviously in charge and knows it. It captures the mentality of the workers, not talking to each other, or emoting, but being led like cattle or property to whatever comes next. This picture symbolizes the power of the white and oppression of the black.

5 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Very nice analyzation of the geometry of the photo. I had not noticed how the lines point to the subject. I, too, did not like him and I think on a subconscious level, those lines aided in my personal judgement. As if to say that this man does not deserve to be pointed to - or this is a photo of the man's ego.

    Nice work!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Very nice interpretation, Merlin. You manage to capture the character of the old man next to the car quite well.

    I ran into a few things along the way that I thought I would mention. First of all, I realize it's a little more difficult beings that these are all written on the internet, but for a blog of this nature I would try to use the correct spelling of "your" instead of "ur." It really knocks down some credibility points, in things like this that tend to be more formal. Also, I would stay away from analyzing what the intent of the photographer was. Intenion is a very intangible and slippery thing to be claiming knowledge of. Unless we speak to Dorothea about it, we really can't claim to know within reason what she meant by this photo. I think it might be better to stick to things that are physical and qualitative, rather than making speculation about things which are beyond the scope of the photograph. Good job, though.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Wow, you really analized the photo. Good job!! I had a hard time focusing on anything but slavery. It really pointed out to me how personal judgments really can get into the way on a photo or piece of art. It would be interesting to actually talk to the photographer and see if she actually had the time to set the camera up, or if was just a quick picture she took. Either way, it is bringing up alot of good conversation.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I disagree with Kenny. While the intent of the photographer shouldn't be all of your analysis, I believe it should still be a part of it. After all, don't we do that with Literature? Obviously, we won't ever know exactly what Dorothea wanted to portay here. But that's the fun thing about this: reading about what others see in a photo. I enjoyed your ideas and thought they were well written!

    ReplyDelete